Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient audit skill body with clear section sequencing and exemplary use of a single one-level-deep reference. Its main weakness is the Check step: it tells Claude what to verify (working contact methods) but not how to verify it, leaving the most important step without executable mechanics.
Suggestions
Add a concrete verification procedure to the Check section (e.g., curl the /contact page, confirm each contact method resolves — mailto deliverability, form endpoint response, phone number format) instead of only stating what to verify.
Include a short re-validation step after the Fix section (re-crawl the rendered page and re-check each method) to close the workflow's feedback loop.
Move the E-E-A-T rationale sentence into references/rule.md or trim it, since it explains background Claude already knows rather than instructing the audit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with concrete Quick Reference bullets and terse Check/Fix sections; the only padding is the opening E-E-A-T rationale sentence ('A clear and accessible contact page is a major trust signal for E-E-A-T...'), which restates knowledge Claude already has and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Fix step is concrete ('Create a `/contact` page and add a contact form, email address...') and Quick Reference names specific items, but the core Check step ('Verify that the website has a dedicated Contact page with multiple, working contact methods') provides no method for verifying the methods actually work — no command, probe, or procedure appears in the body. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review section ordering forms a coherent audit-then-remediate sequence, and verification of the rendered output is signaled ('describe how to verify the final page output'). It falls short of a 5 because there is no explicit validation checkpoint or re-verification loop after applying fixes. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a single well-signaled, one-level-deep reference ('For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see `references/rule.md`'), which is a real file containing the implementation detail; content is appropriately split between body and reference. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |