Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured overview of a single SEO rule with a clean one-level reference to a real bundle file. Its main weaknesses are deferred actionability (code and verification live in the reference) and a workflow that lacks explicit validation checkpoints in the body itself.
Suggestions
Add an inline verification step or two to the Check/Fix flow (e.g., 'Confirm the /contact route returns 200 and the footer link resolves') so the workflow has an explicit checkpoint without forcing a jump to the reference.
Include one short inline code or markup snippet (e.g., a minimal contact-form or footer-link example) so the body is actionable on its own, not only via references/rule.md.
Tighten the opening sentence and the meta 'Explain' directive to remove mild contextual padding and lift conciseness toward a 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized into tight sections (Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, Code Review) with only minor instances of over-explanation, such as the opening E-E-A-T sentence and the meta 'Explain' directive, that could be trimmed; not a 5 because of the slight contextual padding in the introduction. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The Fix is concrete ('Create a `/contact` page and add a contact form, email address, and other relevant contact information') and Code Review names specific review targets, but executable implementation, code examples, and verification steps are deferred to the reference, leaving the body's guidance incomplete. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A rough sequence exists (Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review), but validation checkpoints are only implicit and the actual verification procedure is deferred to references/rule.md rather than stated in the workflow. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview that points to a real one-level-deep reference ('see `references/rule.md`') for full implementation details, with content appropriately split; minor gaps are the generic pointer text and the single reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |