Use when setting up integration testing for a frontend-backend API boundary, evaluating whether two services are safe to deploy independently, or replacing slow end-to-end tests with contract tests.
63
75%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Passed
No findings from the security scan
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/contract-testing/SKILL.mdIntegration tests that require both services running at the same time are slow, brittle, and hard to maintain. Consumer-driven contract testing decouples the consumer and provider test suites — each team can run their tests independently, yet the broker guarantees that the published contract is always verified against the live provider. This catches API mismatches days earlier than end-to-end tests, with far less infrastructure overhead.
Check whether the frontend has consumer-driven contract tests that define and verify the API contract with the backend.
Add Pact consumer tests for the frontend API client, publish the contracts to a broker, and add provider verification to the backend CI pipeline.
Explain how consumer-driven contract testing works, what the Pact workflow looks like end-to-end, and how it compares to mocking and end-to-end testing.
Review the Pact consumer tests. Flag interactions that are too permissive (any-type matchers on fields the consumer actually uses), missing status code assertions, and interactions for endpoints the consumer no longer calls.
For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance,
see references/rule.md.
Rule page: https://frontendchecklist.io/en/rules/testing/contract-testing
48405aa
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.