Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A compact, well-sectioned overview for a simple skill, with a clearly signaled single reference file. Weaknesses are duplicated content between Quick Reference and Check/Fix (and with rule.md), an underspecified verification method for identifying hidden elements, and no post-fix re-test checkpoint.
Suggestions
Specify how to detect hidden elements: e.g., open uBlock Origin's logger ('More' → 'Filter list' hits) or run the EasyList selectors ($$('##.ad, ##.banner, ...')) in the browser devtools console, rather than just 'test the page with uBlock Origin enabled'.
Add a post-fix validation step: re-test with uBlock Origin enabled and grep the codebase (CSS/JS selectors, tests) for the old class/ID before considering the rename complete.
De-duplicate: keep one blocked-pattern list (the fuller one in references/rule.md or a short one in Check), and drop the repeated rename advice from Quick Reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short but noticeably redundant: the blocked-name list appears twice ('Common blocked names: .ad, .ads, .advertisement, .banner...' in Quick Reference and again '.ad, .ads, .advertisement, .banner, .sponsor, #ad, #banner...' in Check), and the rename advice is repeated in Quick Reference ('Rename affected elements using semantic, content-specific class names') and Fix. The opening paragraph also duplicates rule.md's 'Why It Matters' verbatim. This fits anchor 3 (mostly efficient but could be tightened) rather than 4, where duplication would be only a minor trim. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | There is concrete material — a specific pattern list ('.ad, .ads, .advertisement, .banner, .sponsor, #ad, #banner, .cookie-notice, .consent') and copy-ready replacement names ('.privacy-controls or .cookie-preferences instead of .cookie-banner or .gdpr-notice') — but the core Check action is underspecified: 'Test the page with uBlock Origin enabled in a browser to identify elements that are hidden' gives no method for detecting hidden elements (devtools inspection, uBlock's logger, a selector audit) and no before/after code example lives in SKILL.md. This is anchor 3 (some concrete guidance but incomplete, missing key details) rather than 4, where the gaps would be minor. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain sequence is present and readable, but validation is only implicit: 'Test your site with uBlock Origin enabled' appears once up front, with no checkpoint to re-test after renaming or verify the rename didn't break existing CSS/JS selectors. This matches anchor 3 (sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit) rather than 4, which requires most checkpoints present. The skill is non-destructive, so no lower cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a compact overview with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep, verified reference: 'For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see references/rule.md' (the file exists, 158 lines). This fits anchor 4 (good structure, references mostly clear, minor gaps) rather than 5 because content duplicated between SKILL.md and rule.md — the identical opening paragraph and the pattern lists — sits inline where the overview could simply point to the reference. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |