Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-organized, concise overview with clean progressive disclosure to a real reference file and clear thresholds, but the in-body actionability is limited because specific measurement tooling and post-fix verification live only in the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and avoids padding about what flashing/epilepsy means, with only minor redundancy between the 'Quick Reference' bullets and the 'Check' section that could be merged. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete thresholds are given ('no content flashes more than 3 times per second', 'less than 25% of the viewport'), but the measurement guidance is vague ('Use animation tools to measure flash frequency') with no specific tool or command in the body itself. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check → Fix → Code Review flow is present with concrete verification criteria, though there is no explicit re-verification step after a fix is applied. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), and that reference file exists and holds the detailed implementation guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |