Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, appropriately split skill body that delegates detail to a real one-level-deep reference and provides specific audit/fix targets. It is held back by mild conceptual redundancy across the Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review modes and the absence of any executable code or explicit numbered validation workflow in the body itself.
Suggestions
Move executable examples (e.g. a minimal `scroll-padding` snippet) inline or ensure the body explicitly points to the code section of references/rule.md so the Fix step is copy-paste ready.
Consolidate the overlapping Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections to remove the conceptual restatement and tighten the intro rationale.
Express the audit workflow as a numbered sequence with an explicit validation checkpoint (check → apply fix → re-test at zoom/mobile → confirm focus visible) to make the feedback loop explicit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean, but the opening rationale ('A visible focus ring is not enough...') and the overlapping Explain/Code Review modes restate the Check/Fix content; it is not level 3 because some conceptual explanation and redundancy could be tightened, and not level 1 because it avoids explaining basic concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It names concrete fixes ('scroll-padding', reduce overlay height) and specific UI to audit, but the body contains no executable code — examples are deferred to references/rule.md; it is not level 3 because guidance describes rather than providing copy-paste-ready instructions, and not level 1 because the named selectors and fixes are specific rather than vague. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A check → fix → re-test flow is discernible (the Quick Reference includes 'Re-test at zoomed and mobile layouts'), but the body is organized by mode (Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review) rather than a numbered sequence with explicit validation checkpoints; it is not level 3 because checkpoints are implicit rather than an explicit validate→fix→retry loop, and not level 1 because the audit and remediation steps are present. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview points to a well-signaled one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md' for full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance), and that file exists; it is not level 2 because the split is clean and clearly navigated rather than inline-bloated or poorly signaled. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |