Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clean, well-organized overview that progresses sensibly and appropriately offloads detail to a single one-level-deep reference. Its one gap is actionability: it gives clear instructions but no copy-paste markup example of a correctly titled iframe.
Suggestions
Add a concrete copy-paste example such as `<iframe src="ad.html" title="Advertisement"></iframe>` (and a non-empty vs empty contrast) under Fix.
Include a brief verification step, e.g., checking the Accessibility tree or running an axe-core rule for frame-title, to make the Check section executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; short bullets and imperatives each earn their place, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete ("Add a descriptive title attribute to every <iframe>", "Verify that all <iframe> and <frame> elements have a non-empty 'title' attribute") but lacks a copy-paste HTML example showing the attribute applied, leaving it incomplete rather than fully executable. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill, the Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review sections give an unambiguous sequence with no destructive or batch operation requiring validation checkpoints, qualifying for the simple-skill score-3 allowance. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise, well-sectioned overview points one level deep to "references/rule.md" (a real, existing file), matching the clear-overview-with-well-signaled-one-level-deep-references anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |