Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with concrete, executable guidance and a clean one-level reference to a real bundle file; its main weakness is redundant re-explanation of the QDF freshness concept across the intro and Explain sections.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicate QDF/freshness explanation — keep it in one place (either the intro or the Explain section) and reference it rather than restating it.
Make the Apache guidance as concrete as the Nginx directive, e.g. provide the exact 'Header set Last-Modified' directive or config snippet.
Format the Check steps as a true numbered list instead of an inline '(1)...(2)...(3)...(4)...' paragraph so the verification sequence is scannable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The QDF/freshness algorithm is explained twice — once in the opening paragraph and again in the 'Explain' section — which is redundant padding of a concept Claude already knows; otherwise the body is mostly efficient. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides mostly executable guidance: a concrete Nginx directive ('add_header Last-Modified $date_gmt;'), a real JSON-LD snippet with an ISO 8601 date, and numbered Check/Fix steps; the Apache guidance ('ensure mod_headers is enabled') is comparatively vague, a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear numbered sequences in the Check and Fix sections, with the Check and Code Review sections serving as verification checkpoints; this is a configuration/audit skill rather than a destructive or batch operation, so the missing explicit validate-retry loop does not trigger the cap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections form a concise overview, and the body closes with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference to the existing 'references/rule.md' for full implementation details, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |