Content
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with clean progressive disclosure to a real reference file, but it carries mild redundancy, vague tooling pointers, and validation steps that are implicit rather than inline.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the "never skip heading levels" guidance and the screen-reader-navigation explanation so each appears once.
Name the concrete verification tools inline (e.g. HeadingsMap extension, DevTools heading outline) and add an explicit verify step rather than deferring all tooling to references/rule.md.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean, but "never skip heading levels" recurs across Quick Reference, Check, and Fix, and the known concept "Screen reader users navigate by headings like a table of contents" is restated in both the intro and Explain sections. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Rules are specific (one h1, h1 → h2 → h3, descriptive text) but the tooling guidance is vague ("Use accessibility tools to generate a heading outline") and the concrete tool names live only in references/rule.md. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Code Review sequence is present, but validation/verification checkpoints are implicit since the actual verification tooling is delegated to references/rule.md rather than stated inline. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview with a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ("see references/rule.md"), and the referenced bundle file exists. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |