Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, actionable skill body with a clear Check→Fix flow and a properly signaled one-level reference file. Its weaknesses are repetition of the same crawl-limit facts across sections and the absence of a post-fix verification step.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated ~15MB / crawl-budget statements: keep them in the intro and delete the overlapping Quick Reference bullet and Explain paragraph, or fold Explain into Quick Reference.
Add an explicit post-fix verification step to the Fix workflow (e.g., re-run the curl measurement to confirm the page is under the 2MB target after remediation).
Consolidate the 'Check' and 'Code Review' sections, which overlap on measuring raw HTML bytes and inspecting __NEXT_DATA__ blocks, to tighten the body further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient but the ~15MB/crawl-budget fact is restated across the intro, the Quick Reference bullets, and the Explain section, which is repetition a tightening pass would remove; this fits the score-2 anchor rather than the lean score-3 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides an executable curl one-liner, concrete thresholds (2MB investigate / 5MB critical, flag blocks over 500KB), and specific per-cause fixes — copy-paste-ready actionable guidance matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check→Fix sequence is clearly present with a diagnostic checkpoint, but there is no post-fix verification/re-measure step confirming the HTML dropped below target, fitting the score-2 anchor for missing checkpoints. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that clearly signals a one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md', a verified file), matching the score-3 anchor for well-organized, appropriately split content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |