Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, lean overview with concrete audit/fix guidance and an appropriately placed reference file for examples. The chief improvement is adding an explicit post-fix verification step and trimming the mild redundancy across intro/Quick Reference/Explain.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verify-after-fix checkpoint in the Fix section (e.g., 'Re-inspect <html> to confirm both attributes now match and the value is a valid BCP 47 tag').
Consolidate the repeated lang/xml:lang-matching rationale between the intro, Quick Reference, and Explain to reduce redundancy.
Surface at least one inline correct/incorrect markup snippet in the Check section so the core example is visible without opening the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is sectioned and largely efficient, but the intro, Quick Reference, and Explain sections restate the core lang/xml:lang-matching fact, leaving minor trimmable redundancy. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Check and Fix give concrete, specific guidance (inspect <html>, compare subtags, validate BCP 47, remove xml:lang for HTML5); code examples live in the reference file, which is appropriate for this audit skill, leaving only minor gaps inline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check→Fix sequence is clear and unambiguous for this single-purpose skill, but there is no explicit re-verification step after applying a fix, a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview organized into clear sections with a single, well-signaled one-level-deep pointer to references/rule.md (a real file) for code examples and details, making navigation easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |