Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A competently structured review skill: a concise overview with clear sections and a clean one-level reference into rule.md. It is held back by redundancy across Quick Reference/Check/Fix, motivational padding, and verification steps that live only in the reference rather than the body.
Suggestions
Collapse the Check/Fix/Explain sections into the Quick Reference or move them into references/rule.md to remove paraphrase redundancy and tighten conciseness.
Add an explicit in-body verification checkpoint (e.g. 'run axe/Lighthouse on a representative rendered state; confirm Tab traverses all interactive elements in visual order') so the workflow has a concrete validation step.
Drop the '15% of users rely on keyboard navigation' motivational opener — it explains a concept Claude already knows and earns no token budget.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The Quick Reference bullets are lean, but the Check/Fix/Explain sections largely paraphrase them and the "15% of users rely on keyboard navigation" opener is motivational padding Claude does not need; could be tightened. Not verbose enough to drop to 2. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete rules appear (tabindex='-1', no positive tabindex, Tab reachability), but the actual verification tooling and code examples are deferred to references/rule.md, leaving the body's guidance incomplete for execution. Not minimal enough for 2, not complete enough for 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A loose Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence is present, but there is no explicit validation/verification checkpoint in the body (verification lives only in the reference), so checkpoints are implicit rather than stated. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-sectioned overview with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep pointer to the real references/rule.md for full details and code; minor gap is mild redundancy between Quick Reference and Check/Fix rather than a fully clean split. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |