CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

link-text

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use descriptive link text. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

65

Quality

79%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/link-text/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The skill body is a well-structured, concise overview that defers detailed code examples to a single clearly-signaled reference file, with concrete actionable guidance inline. Its main weakness is mild content duplication between the body and references/rule.md and an implicit rather than explicit verification checkpoint.

Suggestions

Make the verification checkpoint explicit in the body (e.g., a 'Verify' step naming axe/Lighthouse and a keyboard-only re-test) rather than folding it into the Code Review prose.

Trim overlap between the body's Quick Reference/Check/Fix bullets and references/rule.md so the body stays a pure overview and the reference holds the detail.

Add one small inline HTML example (bad vs. good anchor text) in the body so the skill is self-sufficient for the most common case without requiring a file read.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and well-organized into Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, and Code Review sections with no padding about concepts Claude already knows; the only minor over-explanation is the opening sentence restating how screen-reader link navigation works, which could be trimmed.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, actionable guidance — specific phrases to avoid ('click here', 'read more'), when to use aria-label/aria-labelledby, and including file type and size for downloads — and defers executable HTML examples to references/rule.md, which contains complete copy-paste-ready snippets; the body itself has no inline code, a minor gap.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear sequenced structure (Quick Reference -> Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review) with a verification nudge ('verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech'), though the validation checkpoint is implicit rather than an explicit validate-then-proceed step.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a concise overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference at the end ('see references/rule.md'), and that file exists and holds the detailed code examples; minor organization gaps come from some overlap between the body's Quick Reference/Check/Fix content and the reference file.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is strong: it pairs an explicit 'Use when...' trigger with a concrete list of accessibility review actions, using appropriate third-person imperative voice. It is mostly distinct from sibling skills, with only minor overlap risk from the broad 'rendered HTML / design-system patterns' framing.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists several concrete review actions — 'Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output' — with only minor coverage gaps (no mention of specific link-text fixes), fitting the 'several specific actions' anchor above the 3-anchor midpoint.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (check native semantics, inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, screen-reader output) and 'when' (an explicit 'Use when reviewing rendered HTML...' trigger clause), matching the anchor that requires concrete trigger phrases for both.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Covers 'rendered HTML, interactive components, design-system patterns' plus the rule name 'Use descriptive link text', giving good natural-term coverage, though common user phrases like 'click here', 'link text', or 'accessibility' are not present, keeping it just below the comprehensive anchor.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Scoped to the specific 'Use descriptive link text' rule with a distinct niche, but the broad framing ('reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns') creates minor overlap risk with sibling accessibility review skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.