Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean instruction skill with actionable guidance, a clear workflow, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure to a real reference file. There is light redundancy across the Check and Code Review sections but it does not meaningfully harm the skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean with no padding of concepts Claude already knows; each section (Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, Code Review) earns its place, with only minor restatement across sections. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific — 'refactor the injection to target document.head instead of document.body' and the Code Review algorithm (traverse the parent chain, flag if an ancestor is <body>) — with no code only because it is an instruction-only skill, which the rubric does not penalize. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review flow is an unambiguous sequence for a single, non-destructive task; the simple-skill note allows a 3 without an explicit validation checkpoint. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that clearly signals a one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), and that bundle file exists and holds the detailed implementation. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |