Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a lean, well-structured instruction skill that uses progressive disclosure effectively, offloading examples to a real reference file. The only weakness is mild redundancy between the Explain and Quick Reference sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with clear sections, but the 'Explain' section restates what a <title> tag does (a concept Claude already knows) and Quick Reference overlaps the Check and Code Review sections; it is above the 'mostly efficient with some unnecessary explanation' anchor but not fully lean. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, checkable criteria are given (length 10–60, uniqueness, keyword in first half, exactly one tag), providing actionable guidance; it stops short of fully executable copy-paste code in the body, delegating examples to the reference, so it is below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill, the Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence is unambiguous and well-sequenced; the simple-skill exception applies and no destructive/batch validation cap is triggered. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with one clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), and detailed examples/code are appropriately split into the reference file, matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |