CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

organization

Use when auditing structured data on a business or brand website homepage. Applies to organisations, companies, non-profits, and publishers that want accurate Knowledge Panel information in Google Search.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/organization/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, concise single-purpose skill body that defers detail to one clearly-signaled reference and includes concrete checks plus a validation step. It could improve actionability by inlining a minimal copy-paste JSON-LD example and tighten the one restated Knowledge Panel explanation.

Suggestions

Inline a minimal copy-paste Organization JSON-LD snippet (name, url, logo, sameAs) in the 'Fix' section so the body is executable without opening the reference.

Remove the restated Knowledge Panel explanation in 'Explain' since the opening paragraph already covers it, recovering tokens.

Make the workflow sequence explicit with numbered steps and a 'validate → fix → re-validate' loop to push workflow clarity toward level 5.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean with tightly-scoped Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, and Code Review sections and no padding or explanations of concepts Claude already knows; the only minor redundancy is the Knowledge Panel concept restated in both the opening and 'Explain' section, keeping it just below the fully lean level 5.

4 / 5

Actionability

It gives concrete, specific guidance — exact properties to verify (name, url, logo as ImageObject, sameAs with ≥2 profiles), the validation tool (Google's Rich Results Test), and an interior-page duplication check — but keeps copy-paste code in the reference rather than inline, leaving a minor gap versus fully executable guidance.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear Check → Fix → Code Review → Validate sequence is present with an explicit validation checkpoint (Rich Results Test) and a verification step (confirm schema is not duplicated on interior pages); it lacks a numbered feedback-loop structure, so it sits just below the level-5 checklist anchor.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a well-organized overview with clearly-labeled sections and a single, clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md') that holds the bulk examples, matching the top anchor exactly.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, explicit trigger-style description that clearly states both what the skill does and when to use it, with natural keywords and a well-scoped niche. Its main weakness is specificity — it names only one concrete action rather than enumerating multiple operations.

Suggestions

List 2-3 concrete actions (e.g., 'auditing Organization JSON-LD, verifying Knowledge Panel properties, fixing missing logo/sameAs fields') to lift specificity toward the top anchor.

Add common synonyms users actually say — 'schema markup', 'JSON-LD', 'SEO' — to broaden trigger-term coverage.

Mention the validation tool ('Google's Rich Results Test') in the description to sharpen the distinctiveness of the niche.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names the domain ('auditing structured data on a business or brand website homepage') but enumerates only one concrete action — auditing — without listing multiple specific operations, fitting the '1-2 concrete actions, not comprehensive' anchor rather than the multi-action level 5.

3 / 5

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ('auditing structured data on a business or brand website homepage') and when ('Use when auditing structured data on a business or brand website homepage') with a concrete trigger phrase, matching the top anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

It includes natural phrases a user would say ('structured data', 'business or brand website homepage', 'Knowledge Panel information', 'Google Search', 'organisations, companies, non-profits, and publishers') but omits common synonyms such as 'schema markup', 'JSON-LD', or 'SEO', so coverage is good rather than comprehensive.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The homepage + Knowledge Panel + Organization-schema niche is clearly distinct and unlikely to trigger unrelated skills, though it has minor overlap with broader SEO/structured-data skills rather than being a zero-conflict niche.

4 / 5

Total

16

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.