Content
70%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, concise overview that correctly defers detail to a real one-level-deep reference file, scoring well on workflow clarity and progressive disclosure. It loses points on conciseness due to a duplicated beneficiary list and on actionability because concrete examples live only in the reference, leaving the body's guidance somewhat abstract.
Suggestions
Remove the near-verbatim duplication of the beneficiary list between the opening paragraph and the "Explain" section; keep it in one place.
Add one or two concrete ❌/✅ plain-language examples directly in the body (e.g., "utilize" → "use") so the core guidance is actionable without opening the reference.
Tighten the Check/Fix sections from abstract directives into specific, scannable checks the reviewer can apply immediately.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The opening line ("Plain language helps users with cognitive disabilities, learning differences, attention disorders, non-native speakers, and anyone reading quickly or under stress") is repeated nearly verbatim in the "Explain" section, so the body is mostly efficient but carries unnecessary repetition, matching the score-2 anchor; not 3 because not every token earns its place, not 1 because it is not padded with concepts Claude does not need. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Quick Reference gives concrete directives ("Define technical terms when first used", "Write in active voice, not passive", "Target reading level appropriate for your audience (often 8th grade)"), but the body itself holds no concrete examples and Check/Fix are abstract ("Review content for jargon", "Simplify complex sentences"), matching the score-2 "some concrete guidance but incomplete" anchor; not 3 because there are no copy-paste-ready examples in the body, not 1 because the guidance is concrete and directive. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The body is organized as a clear Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review structure for a simple, single-purpose content rule; per the simple-skills scoring note, clear organization can score 3 without explicit multi-step workflows, and this is not a destructive or batch operation requiring validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md body is a concise overview that clearly signals a one-level-deep reference ("For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see `references/rule.md`"); the referenced file exists and contains the detailed content, matching the score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |