CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

skip-link

Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Implement 'Skip to Content' links. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.

67

Quality

81%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

70%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A clean, well-structured overview that delegates detail to a real one-level-deep reference. The main weaknesses are a redundant known-concept opening and implementation specifics being deferred rather than shown inline.

Suggestions

Drop or trim the opening sentence explaining what skip links are — Claude already knows this — and remove the redundancy between the Quick Reference bullets and the Fix section.

Add a minimal inline HTML/CSS snippet showing the visible-on-focus pattern (e.g. the visually-hidden plus :focus reveal technique) so the body is actionable without requiring the reference.

Make the verification step an explicit checkpoint in the Fix flow (e.g. 'Tab from the URL bar and confirm the skip link receives visible focus and jumps to #main') rather than only mentioning verification in the Code Review section.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient, but the opening sentence explains what skip links are (a concept Claude already knows) and the Quick Reference bullets restate the Fix section, so it could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

The Quick Reference and Fix steps are concrete (first focusable element, visible on focus, target main content ID) but the key implementation specifics — the visible-on-focus CSS technique — are deferred to the reference rather than shown inline.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

As a simple single-purpose skill it presents a clear Check→Fix→Explain→Code Review sequence, and the Code Review section includes verification guidance ("note how to verify the fix with browser accessibility tooling or assistive tech").

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md is a concise overview that clearly signals a single one-level-deep reference ("see `references/rule.md`"); the referenced file exists and contains no nested references, so content is appropriately split with easy navigation.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

92%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description with an explicit 'Use when' trigger and multiple concrete inspection actions. Its only weakness is a broad accessibility-review opener that could overlap with related skills in an accessibility family.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete inspection actions — "Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output" — matching the anchor that lists several specific concrete actions.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: the trigger ("Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns...") and the what ("Check native semantics first, then inspect..."), satisfying the both-what-and-when anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms a user would say — "Skip to Content" links, "keyboard behavior", "focus flow", "accessible names", and "screen-reader" — giving good coverage of natural vocabulary.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is skip links (distinct), but the broad opener "reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns" could plausibly fire sibling accessibility skills, so it is somewhat specific but still overlapping rather than unlikely to conflict.

2 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.