Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, well-structured overview with actionable, location-specific guidance and a clean one-level reference split. Its main weakness is redundant repetition of the E-E-A-T rationale across three sections; trimming those to a single statement would sharpen it further.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is short and mostly tight, but the E-E-A-T rationale is stated three times (intro paragraph, Quick Reference bullet with the acronym expanded, and the Explain section). Anchor 3 (mostly efficient, could be tightened) fits better than 4 because that repeated point is a clear trim. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific instruction throughout — exact locations to check ("footer, header, and About page"), exact schema shape ("Organization or Person JSON-LD schema with a sameAs array"), and named platforms ("LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Facebook, etc."). It lands at anchor 4 rather than 5 only because no copy-paste JSON-LD example is inline (it lives in references/rule.md). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sections form a clear, unambiguous sequence appropriate to a simple audit/fix skill, with the Check section acting as a verification checklist. It is 4 rather than 5 because there is no explicit re-validation step after the Fix. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise, well-sectioned overview with one clearly signaled, one-level-deep pointer ("see references/rule.md") to a real file that holds the implementation details (JSON-LD examples, platform guidance, verification steps). This matches the anchor-5 structure exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |