Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, mostly lean overview that delegates implementation detail to a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference, with concrete actionable guidance and a verification step. Minor gains are available from tightening the Explain section and adding an explicit validate-retry loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean with tight Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, and Code Review sections and only minimal contextual padding (the E-E-A-T opener); it is not a 5 because the 'Explain' section restates rationale already covered. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete and specific — check footer/header/About, add a sameAs array with named platforms (LinkedIn, Twitter/X, Facebook) — with minor gaps; inline executable code lives in the reference file, which is acceptable for this instruction-style skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check -> Fix -> Explain -> Code Review sequence with a verification step ('describe how to verify the final page output') is present; it is not a 5 because there is no explicit validate-fix-retry feedback loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that clearly signals one-level-deep detail ('see references/rule.md' for code examples and framework guidance), and that referenced file exists in the bundle, matching the anchor for well-signaled easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |