Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, efficient audit skill: concrete check criteria, a sensible Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review flow, and exemplary progressive disclosure with a single well-signaled reference file. The only refinements are trimming the Explain section's re-teaching of RFC 3986 and adding a post-fix verification step.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and dense — 'Scan all crawled URL paths for characters outside `[A-Za-z0-9\-_./~]`' delivers exact guidance in one line. The 'Explain' section directs Claude to re-explain RFC 3986 reserved/unreserved basics it already knows, and the trailing rule-page URL duplicates frontmatter metadata, so a few tokens could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: an exact character class to scan against, specific flag conditions ('spaces (`%20` or literal)', 'separate 200 responses'), and a specific fix path ('Replace spaces with hyphens... Set up redirects'). Not fully copy-paste ready — no inline crawl/export command and the slugify example lives only in the reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sequence with headers, and an explicit verification checkpoint ('Check if different encodings of the same URL return separate 200 responses'). Minor gap: no post-fix validation step such as verifying the new redirects resolve. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A short, well-sectioned overview with a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference — 'For full implementation details, code examples, and framework-specific guidance, see `references/rule.md`' — and that file exists and carries the bulk detail (tables, examples, slugify code) without nesting further. Matches the ideal overview-plus-reference structure. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |