Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and uses progressive disclosure well, pushing detailed examples into a clearly signaled reference, but it stops short of executable guidance and omits an in-body verification step.
Suggestions
Add one small copy-paste-ready snippet (e.g., the min-inline-size button fix) or a concrete pseudo-locale command so the body is actionable without opening the reference.
Include an explicit verification step in the body (e.g., "run a pseudo-locale preview and confirm no button/label overflows") to close the Check→Fix loop.
Make the pseudo-locale build step concrete by naming the tool or flag to set rather than only describing the intent.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and well-organized into Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, and Code Review sections with no padding, and it defers all detail to the reference file. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete CSS fix guidance is given ("Replace fixed inline-size with min-inline-size", "remove overflow: hidden") and the Code Review section lists specific properties to find, but the pseudo-locale build step is described vaguely and no executable code or examples appear in the body. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review structure is clear, but there is no validation or verification checkpoint in the body itself; verification lives only in the reference and is not signaled here. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A concise overview defers full detail to a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ("see `references/rule.md`") which exists and holds the examples, code, and verification content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |