CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

third-party-cookies

Use when reviewing a website for privacy compliance, third-party resource loading, or cookie consent implementation.

65

Quality

78%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/third-party-cookies/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

57%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized overview that appropriately defers detail to a one-level reference, but it re-explains concepts Claude already knows, offers abstract Fix guidance with no inline executable examples, and lacks explicit validation checkpoints. These keep three of four dimensions at the midpoint.

Suggestions

Trim the intro paragraph and Quick Reference of facts Claude already knows (e.g. what third-party cookies do, the GDPR penalty figure) to lift conciseness toward a lean overview.

Add at least one inline, copy-paste-ready Fix example — such as the youtube-nocookie.com iframe or a SameSite Set-Cookie header — so the body is actionable without forcing a reference jump.

Insert an explicit validation checkpoint after Check/Fix, e.g. 'Re-run the Network panel and confirm no third-party Set-Cookie headers remain before treating the rule as satisfied,' to add a feedback loop to the workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is short and structured, but the intro paragraph re-explains what third-party cookies do and the GDPR penalty ('up to 4% of global annual turnover') — concepts Claude already knows — so it is mostly efficient rather than fully lean.

2 / 3

Actionability

The Check section gives concrete DevTools guidance ('Network panel and Application panel (Cookies section)'), but the Fix section is abstract ('Replace cross-site tracking with privacy-preserving first-party analytics') with no inline executable examples, leaving key details deferred to the reference.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The Check/Fix/Explain/Code Review sections provide a loose sequence, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops in the body — verification is only implied ('verify them against the effective production-like response').

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a clear overview that signals a single one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), and the detailed code/tables are appropriately split into that existing file, matching the well-signaled-navigation anchor.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is concise and well-targeted, opening with an explicit 'Use when...' trigger, naming a distinct privacy/cookie-consent niche, and using natural trigger terms. It satisfies both the 'what' and 'when' requirements without padding. No changes needed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names three concrete review targets — 'privacy compliance, third-party resource loading, or cookie consent implementation' — rather than vague language, matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

The explicit 'Use when reviewing a website for...' clause answers both what (reviewing for these compliance areas) and when, satisfying the explicit-trigger requirement rather than capping at 2.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural user-facing terms like 'privacy compliance', 'cookie consent', and 'reviewing a website' give good coverage of phrases a user would actually say when needing this skill.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

It carves a clear website-privacy/cookie niche with distinct triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
thedaviddias/Front-End-Checklist
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.