Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with good progressive disclosure and actionable markup, but it carries redundant explanation in the 'Explain' section and lacks explicit validation checkpoints in its workflow.
Suggestions
Trim or merge the 'Explain' section so the captions-vs-subtitles distinction is stated once, and cut the regulatory/statistical framing Claude already knows to improve conciseness.
Make verification an explicit numbered step in the workflow (e.g., 'Validate: confirm the .vtt file exists and renders; if empty or missing non-speech cues, fix and re-check') to add a clear validate→fix→retry loop.
Inline a minimal WebVTT snippet in the 'Fix' section so the core recipe is fully executable without opening the reference.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the 'Explain' section duplicates the captions-vs-subtitles distinction from Quick Reference and the intro includes regulatory/statistical framing Claude largely already knows. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready markup in 'Fix' (<track kind='captions' srclang='en' label='English' src='captions-en.vtt' default>) and specific inspection steps in 'Check', with minor gaps (full WebVTT example lives in the reference). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A Check-then-Fix sequence is present with some verification guidance, but validation checkpoints are implicit rather than explicit numbered validate→fix→retry steps. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Body is organized into clear sections and signals a single one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), which exists and holds the deeper code examples and tables. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |