Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable, with a clean sequenced Check/Fix workflow containing explicit verification steps and an appropriately split one-level reference to rule.md. Its main weakness is conciseness: the captions-vs-subtitles distinction is redundant across sections and the intro leans on motivational framing Claude largely already knows.
Suggestions
Collapse the captions-vs-subtitles explanation into one location (keep it in Explain, drop the duplicate line in Quick Reference) to remove redundancy.
Trim the intro's motivational framing (beneficiary list, "essential", "legal compliance failure") to the specific facts Claude does not already know — the 15% statistic and the WCAG/ADA/EN 301 549 citations — leaving persuasion out.
Reword the "Use when applies to all `<video>` elements" trigger into a natural clause such as "Use when the page contains `<video>` elements or embedded YouTube/Vimeo videos."
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient, but the captions-vs-subtitles distinction is restated across Quick Reference and Explain, and the intro paragraph is partly motivational ("essential", "legal compliance failure") covering benefits Claude largely already knows — fitting the "could be tightened" anchor rather than the every-token-earns-its-place level of 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete numbered Fix steps with a copy-paste `<track kind='captions' srclang='en' label='English' src='captions-en.vtt' default>` snippet and specific Check guidance; for an instruction-type skill this is actionable and copy-paste ready, not the vague/pseudocode profile of 2. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check section is a sequenced checklist with explicit validation ("Verify the `default` attribute is present", "check that the `.vtt` file exists and is valid (not empty, not just music notes)") and Fix is numbered (1)–(4); checkpoints are explicit rather than the missing/implicit profile of 2. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview sections (Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, Code Review) with a well-signaled one-level-deep pointer to `references/rule.md`, which exists and holds the full code examples — matching the clear-overview-with-one-level-references anchor rather than the inline-bloat or poorly-signaled profile of 2. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |