Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured and actionable with a clean Check/Fix workflow and excellent progressive disclosure to a real reference file. Its main weakness is mild verbosity from re-explaining the poster concept Claude already knows.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient with clear Check/Fix lists, but the 'Explain' section re-describes the poster attribute and preload behavior Claude already knows, and Quick Reference/Check/Fix overlap somewhat, so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Check and Fix give concrete, executable guidance such as `<video poster='thumbnail.jpg' controls>` and specific dimensions (1280×720, 640×360), with only minor gaps (no inline code example, which lives in the reference). | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check→Fix flow is a clear sequence with validation checkpoints (URL resolves with no 404s, dimensions set to prevent CLS, poster represents content), though explicit re-check/retry feedback loops are only implicit in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview (Quick Reference, Check, Fix, Explain, Code Review) that signals a single one-level-deep reference — `references/rule.md` — which exists and holds the detailed code examples, tables, and verification steps. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |