Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a clear, actionable overview with excellent progressive disclosure and a simple, well-sequenced workflow; its main weakness is redundancy across the Quick Reference, Check, and Explain sections. Consolidating the repeated WCAG rationale and correct-tag statements would improve token efficiency.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but repeats material — the correct viewport tag appears in Quick Reference, Fix, and again, and the WCAG 1.4.4 rationale is restated across Quick Reference, Check, and Explain — so it could be tightened to remove redundant explanation Claude already has. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives copy-paste-ready guidance: the exact correct tag '<meta name=viewport content=width=device-width, initial-scale=1>', the specific values to flag, and a concrete CSS fix ('set form input font-size: 1rem (16px)') for the iOS input-zoom case. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-task skill, the Check → Fix → Explain → Code Review sections form a clear, well-organized sequence with no destructive or batch operation requiring validation feedback loops, meeting the simple-skill bar for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that offloads full code examples and framework guidance to a single, clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ('see references/rule.md'), which exists as a real file, matching the well-structured overview anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |