Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with copy-paste-ready guidance, a clear simple-skill workflow, and clean one-level progressive disclosure. The main weakness is mild verbosity from explaining a known concept in the intro and restating in the Check/Explain sections.
Suggestions
Trim the opening paragraph and the Check/Explain sections to remove restating of concepts Claude already knows, improving token efficiency.
Make the Check step concrete by tying verification explicitly to the disallowed attributes (maximum-scale=1, user-scalable=no) rather than the generic 'proper viewport meta tag'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The Quick Reference and Fix sections are lean and actionable, but the opening paragraph explains the viewport concept (which Claude already knows) and the Check/Explain sections add some restating that could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides the exact, copy-paste-ready meta tag and an explicit prohibition ('Never use maximum-scale=1 or user-scalable=no'), giving fully executable guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a simple single-action skill with an unambiguous Check -> Fix -> Code Review sequence supported by the concrete Quick Reference; the simple-skill allowance applies since it is not a destructive or batch operation. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview with clearly signaled, one-level-deep navigation to references/rule.md (a real file), keeping detail appropriately separated. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |