Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a concise, well-structured overview that assumes Claude's competence and delegates detail to a single real reference file. The main gap is the absence of a complete copy-paste JSON-LD example inline, which keeps actionability just short of fully executable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., it never explains what JSON-LD or schema is); every section earns its place, matching the 'Lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance is present via specific field names ("@type": "WebSite", SearchAction, target, "query-input": "required name=search_term_string", {search_term_string} placeholder), but there is no complete copy-paste code block inline — the full example is delegated to references — so it is 'mostly executable' rather than fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Check, Fix, Explain, and Code Review sections form a clear sequenced workflow, and verification of the final page output is mentioned, but explicit validation checkpoints are only lightly signaled, matching 'clear sequence with most checkpoints present; minor validation gaps.' | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a single well-signaled, one-level-deep reference to references/rule.md (verified to exist), giving clear navigation appropriate for a simple skill. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |