Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, actionable guide with concrete commands for every operation and a clearly sequenced workflow including maintenance. Its only notable gaps are the absence of explicit validation checkpoints and minor verbatim redundancy with the description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient — terse command blocks, a compact filter-options list, and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Minor trimmable redundancy exists (line 8 repeats the frontmatter description verbatim), so it does not reach anchor 5's 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Every operation has a fully executable, copy-paste-ready command with concrete example arguments (build_corpus, prime_corpus, query_corpus, rebuild_corpus, reprime_corpus) plus a specific filter-options table covering project, types, concepts, files, query, date range, and limit. This matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-4 are clearly sequenced, the maintenance loop (rebuild then reprime) is explicit, and list_corpora showing 'stats and priming status' acts as a status checkpoint. There are no explicit validation or error-recovery steps, so it falls short of anchor 5 but is well above anchor 3's implicit checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single compact, self-contained file (~76 lines) with well-organized sections (What, Workflow steps, Tips, Maintenance) and no content that warrants splitting into separate files. Per the simple-skill guideline, well-organized sections with no need for external references earn the top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |