Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean skill body: dense decision guidance with concrete file and tool references, explicit boundary routing, condition-gated one-level-deep references that all resolve to real files, and a verification section with fallbacks. The only gap is the absence of executable commands in verification and a couple of implicit step orderings.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and padding-free: every line is a directive, boundary, or pointer ("Write clear Dart that fits the project's SDK constraint and established style"), with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows — every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete decision rules cite specific files, globs, and tools ("Read the SDK constraint in `pubspec.yaml`", "`*.g.dart`, `*.freezed.dart`", "freezed, json_serializable"), but guidance like "Run formatting, static analysis, and the narrowest relevant tests" stops short of executable commands, leaving minor gaps versus fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sequencing is explicit where it matters ("before using newer syntax") and the Verification section includes a fallback path ("Use Dart MCP semantic lookup... otherwise inspect source and use the project CLI") plus downstream call-site checks, but verification steps are unsequenced and lack error-recovery feedback loops, falling short of anchor 5's explicit checkpoints. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear overview (Decisions / Verification / Boundaries / References / Sources) with three well-signaled, one-level-deep references each gated by a condition ("Read [patterns and records migration]... when adopting pattern matching, destructuring, switch expressions, or multiple returns"); all referenced files exist in references/ and contain no nested references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |