Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplary lean overview for an instruction-only skill: it enforces evidence-first workflow, routes diagnosis by symptom, and splits detail cleanly into two real, well-signaled reference files. The only shortfalls are the absence of concrete commands and an in-body error-recovery loop, both of which are partially covered by the references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~35-line body is lean and assumes Claude's competence, teaching only non-obvious facts ("Debug-mode timing is not release-performance evidence", "counts alone are not a bug") with zero padding, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, specific directives ("Record the target device, Flutter version, build mode, flow, dataset, and metric", "compare repeated-flow snapshots", "use Flutter's app-size analysis") with named tools make the guidance mostly executable, but no exact commands (e.g., the profile-mode run command or DevTools entry points) appear, matching anchor 4 rather than the copy-paste-ready anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is present — establish evidence before changing code, attribute by symptom, apply the smallest intervention, then "Repeat the same scenario after the change and report before/after evidence with variance" — but there is no explicit error-recovery feedback loop in the body itself, so it matches anchor 4 rather than anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview that delegates depth via two clearly signaled one-level-deep references, each with explicit when-to-load guidance ("Load [profile and frame analysis] ... for frame, CPU, image, rebuild, or web-rendering investigations"), and both referenced files exist in the bundle, matching anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |