Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, operational skill: the audit workflow is explicitly sequenced with dated evidence capture and a rerun feedback loop, guidance is largely concrete, and detail is properly pushed to two real, well-anchored reference files. The only notable cost is token weight from an inlined boilerplate ATT code sample and time-sensitive iOS 27 version facts in the main body.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and directive with no beginner-concept padding — e.g., the rejection-reason table and the privacy-manifest summary state criteria, not explanations. Minor trimmable instances keep it below the 5 anchor: the ~20-line ATT Swift block ("let status = await ATTrackingManager.requestTrackingAuthorization()") is API usage Claude already knows, where only the compliance comments and timing rule add value, and version-specific iOS 27 details ("Xcode 27 installs only on Apple silicon Macs and requires macOS Tahoe 26.6") are time-sensitive facts inlined rather than isolated. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly concrete, executable guidance: exact menu paths and commands ("Product > Archive", "xcodebuild -exportArchive", "altool"), a complete ATT code sample, named launch-screen keys ("UILaunchStoryboardName... UILaunchScreens"), and specific criteria ("A privacy policy URL must be set in App Store Connect AND accessible within the app"). It sits below the 5 anchor only because several checks resolve to "re-fetch current guidelines" and the HIG and DMA sections are thin pointers, leaving small execution gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The audit workflow is explicitly sequenced with validation and a feedback loop: "Start every audit by fetching the current... Record the checked date and source beside each release blocker. Then archive-build and validate the exact submission... and rerun the same checks against the rebuilt archive." Checklists (Review Checklist, appeal checkboxes) and validation steps ("Walk through every screen and flow on at least two device sizes") match the 5 anchor's explicit checkpoints and error-recovery loop; this is an audit skill, so no destructive-operation cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a clear overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to real files: "[references/privacy-manifest.md]... for the full structure, reason codes, and checklists" and deep anchors into review-checklists.md (Current Release Requirements, Entitlements and Usage Descriptions, Phased Release Schedule, Metadata Compliance Checklist) that all resolve to actual sections in the bundle. Content is appropriately split (checklists and manifest detail out of the main file), and a Contents list aids navigation, matching the 5 anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |