Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, navigable overview packed with non-obvious Core Haptics lifecycle and parameter gotchas, a clearly sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and an idempotent recovery loop, and a genuine one-level-deep reference holding the executable patterns. Minor trimmable redundancy (the TOC and the paragraph restating the API-ownership table) and the deferral of copy-paste code to the reference keep conciseness and actionability at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious API gotchas ("stoppedHandler... is not called for an explicit stop(completionHandler:)", ".hapticIntensity" vs ".hapticIntensityControl") and contains no concept padding, but the 12-line Contents TOC and the "Do not introduce CHHapticEngine for a normal button tap" paragraph partially restate the preceding API-ownership table. Minor trims are possible, placing it between the 'efficient' anchor 4 and the 'every token earns its place' anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete API-level guidance throughout ("CHHapticEngine.capabilitiesForHardware()", "makeAdvancedPlayer(with:)" for looping/seeking, the retained-player gesture protocol: start, send bounded parameters, throttle, stop on cancel, recreate after reset) plus one complete executable snippet (HapticCapability). The copy-paste-ready engine/event code lives in the reference file rather than the body, leaving minor gaps versus the fully copy-paste-ready anchor 5, while being far above the pseudocode level of anchor 3. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 8-step Implementation Workflow is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints (capability check at step 2, hardware validation at step 8), the Testing section enumerates seven verification scenarios (fallback, cold start, interruption recovery, gesture cancellation, preferences, audio artifacts, battery), reset recovery is described as an idempotent feedback loop, and a 10-item Review Checklist closes the process. This matches anchor 5's combination of sequence, explicit validation, error-recovery loops, and checklists rather than the minor-gaps profile of anchor 4. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-signaled overview that offloads code patterns to a real one-level-deep reference ("Load [Core Haptics patterns](references/core-haptics-patterns.md) when writing engine ownership, programmatic events, live modulation, parameter curves, or AHAP playback"). The sole bundle file exists (216 lines with sections for engine owner, transient, continuous, curve, and AHAP that match the promised contents) and contains no nested references, and navigation is easy via the TOC and References section. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |