Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-built skill body: executable examples at every step, a logical section sequence capped by a review checklist, and clean one-level-deep reference splitting. The main improvement room is trimming boilerplate tokens and adding an explicit error-recovery loop for configuration failures.
Suggestions
Trim the app-launch boilerplate (e.g., drop the `var body: Scene` / `WindowGroup` lines and show only the `init()` configure call) and drop the Contents TOC — the section headings already serve as navigation — to reach full token efficiency.
Add a short error-recovery note for `Tips.configure` failures beyond `assertionFailure` (e.g., when to retry, whether tips can still display unconfigured) to close the workflow's feedback loop.
Consider replacing the one-line 'Tip copy is concise, actionable, and focused on discovery' checklist item with a checkable, mechanical criterion (e.g., title under N characters, one action per tip) so the checklist is fully verifiable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean overall: tight one-line intro, compact bullets, and no re-explanation of SwiftUI/TipKit basics Claude already knows. Minor trimmable padding remains — the full `@main struct` boilerplate (`WindowGroup { ContentView() }`) and the Contents TOC — so it fits the 4 anchor rather than 'every token earns its place'. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste Swift at every stage: `Tips.configure` in `init()`, a complete `Tip` conformance with `#Rule` macros, `Action`, and parameter, `TipView`/`popoverTip` presentation with event donation and `invalidate`, `TipGroup` in `@State`, and `#if DEBUG` overrides with exact launch arguments. Specific examples cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Sections follow the real implementation order (configure at launch, define, present, donate/invalidate, test) and the Review Checklist provides explicit verification checkpoints. Minor gaps: no error-recovery feedback loop beyond `assertionFailure` when `Tips.configure` throws, and the checklist is not tied back to the workflow steps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~150-line body is a genuine overview that keeps details in three clearly labeled, one-level-deep reference files (all verified to exist), with topic-prefixed links ('Rules, events, and placement: [references/rules-events-and-placement.md]') making navigation easy. Matches the 5 anchor; no nested or buried references. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |