Content
93%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a tight, highly actionable workflow with concrete tool calls and exact arguments, well-organized into Steps and Report sections. Its only gap is the absence of an explicit error-recovery feedback loop, which keeps workflow clarity at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and efficient: every line is an actionable tool call or report field, with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows, matching the lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps are fully executable with concrete tool names and exact arguments (e.g. detect_changes_tool(detail_level="minimal"), query_graph_tool(pattern="tests_for", target="<function>")), copy-paste ready and covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence with a conditional checkpoint in step 1 (status: not_ready -> build_or_update_graph_tool and continue), but there is no explicit validate->fix->retry feedback loop for cases where a tool call fails or returns unexpected results. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references, organized into clear ## Steps and ## Report sections; per the simple-skill exception this warrants a 5 with just well-organized sections. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |