Review a PR or branch diff using the knowledge graph for full structural context. Outputs a structured review with blast-radius analysis.
73
91%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Perform a comprehensive code review of a pull request or branch diff using the knowledge graph.
Token optimization: Before starting, call get_docs_section_tool(section_name="review-pr") for the optimized workflow. Never include full files unless explicitly asked.
Identify the changes for the PR:
git diff main...<branch> to get changed filesUpdate the graph by calling build_or_update_graph_tool(base="main") to ensure the graph reflects the current state.
Get the full review context by calling get_review_context_tool(base="main"):
main (or the specified base branch) as the diff baseAnalyze impact by calling get_impact_radius_tool(base="main"):
Deep-dive each changed file:
query_graph_tool(pattern="callers_of", target=<func>) for high-risk functionsquery_graph_tool(pattern="tests_for", target=<func>) to verify test coverageGenerate structured review output:
## PR Review: <title>
### Summary
<1-3 sentence overview>
### Risk Assessment
- **Overall risk**: Low / Medium / High
- **Blast radius**: X files, Y functions impacted
- **Test coverage**: N changed functions covered / M total
### File-by-File Review
#### <file_path>
- Changes: <description>
- Impact: <who depends on this>
- Issues: <bugs, style, concerns>
### Missing Tests
- <function_name> in <file> - no test coverage found
### Recommendations
1. <actionable suggestion>
2. <actionable suggestion>semantic_search_nodes_tool to find related code the PR might have missed805c4c6
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.