CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

review-pr

Review a PR or branch diff using the knowledge graph for full structural context. Outputs a structured review with blast-radius analysis.

73

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Review PR

Perform a comprehensive code review of a pull request or branch diff using the knowledge graph.

Token optimization: Before starting, call get_docs_section_tool(section_name="review-pr") for the optimized workflow. Never include full files unless explicitly asked.

Steps

  1. Identify the changes for the PR:

    • If a PR number or branch is provided, use git diff main...<branch> to get changed files
    • Otherwise auto-detect from the current branch vs main/master
  2. Update the graph by calling build_or_update_graph_tool(base="main") to ensure the graph reflects the current state.

  3. Get the full review context by calling get_review_context_tool(base="main"):

    • This uses main (or the specified base branch) as the diff base
    • Returns all changed files across all commits in the PR
  4. Analyze impact by calling get_impact_radius_tool(base="main"):

    • Review the blast radius across the entire PR
    • Identify high-risk areas (widely depended-upon code)
  5. Deep-dive each changed file:

    • Read the full source of files with significant changes
    • Use query_graph_tool(pattern="callers_of", target=<func>) for high-risk functions
    • Use query_graph_tool(pattern="tests_for", target=<func>) to verify test coverage
    • Check for breaking changes in public APIs
  6. Generate structured review output:

    ## PR Review: <title>
    
    ### Summary
    <1-3 sentence overview>
    
    ### Risk Assessment
    - **Overall risk**: Low / Medium / High
    - **Blast radius**: X files, Y functions impacted
    - **Test coverage**: N changed functions covered / M total
    
    ### File-by-File Review
    #### <file_path>
    - Changes: <description>
    - Impact: <who depends on this>
    - Issues: <bugs, style, concerns>
    
    ### Missing Tests
    - <function_name> in <file> - no test coverage found
    
    ### Recommendations
    1. <actionable suggestion>
    2. <actionable suggestion>

Tips

  • For large PRs, focus on the highest-impact files first (most dependents)
  • Use semantic_search_nodes_tool to find related code the PR might have missed
  • Check if renamed/moved functions have updated all callers
Repository
tirth8205/code-review-graph
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.