Comms Prep — prepare before drafting

A communication's success depends on its being appropriate for its audience, meeting their needs, and having a clear measure of success. This skill helps you prepare the information you need to succeed. When a full review is justified, run /comms-review once your draft is written; your brief supplies the objective, audience, context, evidence sources, and structure plan if appropriate. This is useful both when you are drafting and for independent review agents.

Be liberal: any time you are writing something for people, think comms-prep.

1. Decide whether to reuse or prepare

Adequacy. A brief is adequate when its answers for objective, audience and context, knowledge model, source content, form factor, and style conventions are accurate and complete for the communication.

Reuse. While the conversation and objective remain the same, generally reuse an adequate existing brief. You can amend an existing brief if something has changed and it is no longer adequate. If the form is a back-and-forth communication, it is not necessary to prepare again for each reply.

Scale. Scale the brief to the artifact. For a small artifact it may be four lines answered in seconds: who reads this and when · what do you know that they don't · what must they understand · what would mislead them.

For a routine, low-stakes reply, answer those questions directly, draft, and self-review for the objective, reader understanding, and source meaning. A written brief and /comms-review are not required on this path. A reply is low-stakes when a misunderstanding would be cheap to correct in the next exchange: the same test of objective, audience, and cost of failure that decides below whether a full review is justified. Shortness alone does not make a message low-stakes; a short message that reaches a wide audience, fixes a decision, or will be reused is not on this path. Continue below for substantive or consequential communications.

Authoring boundary. Generally run this skill once you have finished working out the actual information you need to communicate and immediately before drafting the substantive communication. When the requested work is itself writing, that boundary is the start of drafting. When underlying work must happen first, stay with that work until those answers exist; the fact that a report will eventually follow does not move the boundary to task start.

Retroactive use. If a draft already exists with no brief, prepare the brief from the draft's intended purpose rather than copying assumptions out of its text. Then make the brief and draft available to /comms-review.

Where it lives. The brief is an artifact, not a thought: keep it available with the draft for /comms-review reviewers, while keeping it outside the primary reader-facing communication. Keep it in your own scratch space, in context, or as a brief summary directly in chat if appropriate. Do not include the brief with the workspace or files for the audience; this would generally not be appropriate.

2. Write the communications brief

Write a short brief. Read Write the communications brief when creating or materially amending one: it holds the six lines to answer (objective, audience and context, knowledge model, source meaning to preserve, form factor, style and conventions), the structure plan for multi-section and long documents, and the check to run before drafting. Then decide on review:

Add a reminder to call /comms-review

Decide whether the communication is substantive enough to justify running /comms-review once it is complete. /comms-review uses an audience-review loop to check that the communication meets its objective and avoids common failure modes. Judge whether that work is proportionate by considering the objective, audience, and cost of failure. In most circumstances, a few rounds of review cost less than repeated back-and-forth with a confused human. They almost certainly cost less than misleading a wide audience.

If a full review is justified, add a note to the end of the brief instructing the drafting agent to invoke /comms-review when the draft is complete.

3. Unresolved questions

If a question arises during comms prep and you don't know the answer, ask the user when you can get a reply this turn. Otherwise, note the issue in the brief, and use an appropriate escalation path if this significantly affects the quality of the communication. Even when you can ask, sometimes neither of you knows the answer (for example, some information the absent author hasn't provided). Use your best judgement together, and document ambiguity. Do not overstate your certainty or confidence level. Never make stuff up. If some particular part of the communication is not possible, say so, but deliver any unaffected or unrelated remaining parts.

4. Writing the communication

Once you have a good communication brief, use it to go and write a good communication. Say what you mean, as simply as benefits your objective. Avoid mannered prose and metaphor unless it carries key meaning that serves the objective and audience.

Follow the style conventions and skills the brief names.