Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, dense instruction body with a clear three-phase workflow, concrete commands, and good token discipline. Its one material defect is that the sole bundle reference, HTML-REPORT.md, is missing from the skill directory, so the report-generation detail the body depends on is unreachable.
Suggestions
Add the missing HTML-REPORT.md file to the skill bundle (or remove the reference and inline the essential scaffold), since the "Present candidates as an HTML report" phase depends on it.
Specify which sub-agent type/prompt to spawn for the exploration phase so the scan step is fully executable.
Add a fallback instruction for when the temp HTML file cannot be written or opened (e.g., print the path and continue) to close the workflow's one validation gap.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense and assumes Claude's competence, delegating design vocabulary to the codebase-design skill instead of re-explaining it, with concrete commands kept short. Minor editorial padding ("Be visual.", rationale asides like the YAGNI explanation) keeps it short of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives concrete, executable guidance: `git log --oneline`, the `$TMPDIR` fallback chain, the exact output path pattern `<tmpdir>/architecture-review-<timestamp>.html`, per-OS open commands, enumerated card fields, and the exact user prompt to ask. A few directions remain abstract ("spawn a sub-agent" without a type or prompt, "widen the net"), which holds it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly sequenced phases (Explore, Present report, Grilling loop) with an explicit decision checkpoint ("Do NOT propose interfaces yet... ask the user") and ADR-conflict handling; no destructive or batch operations, so the validation cap does not apply. Missing a feedback loop for the HTML write/open step keeps it below anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-sectioned and correctly pushes the HTML scaffold detail to a clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ([HTML-REPORT.md](HTML-REPORT.md)), but that file does not exist in the bundle. Scored against the actual bundle structure, the navigation path to the promised detail is broken, which is more than a minor organization gap. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |