Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an exemplary short-form instruction skill: lean, concrete, and structured as a three-step workflow with explicit per-step completion checkpoints, culminating in a ready-to-adapt template. No weaknesses were identified on any dimension.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~49-line body is lean and efficient with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every instruction ("Grill the send, not the subject", "Done when" criteria, the template) earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill, the guidance is fully concrete: three defined exchanges with what to ask, an explicit output path (`to-questionnaire-<slug>.md`), and a complete copy-adaptable template with answer stubs and a worked question example. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three steps are clearly sequenced and each ends with an explicit validation checkpoint ("Done when you know who the recipient is...", "Done when you have a concrete list...", "Done when the file exists and every item... is covered"), which functions as a feedback loop before proceeding. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is under 50 lines with no need for external references (none exist in the bundle), and it is well organized into numbered steps, a Document structure section, and a clearly delimited template block — the simple-skill case where well-organized sections alone merit a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |