Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, concrete operating manual: it defines the skill-specific concept of a fragment with a valuable taxonomy, gives an exact file format, and specifies the runtime discipline (append-only, re-read before write, preserve user edits). Its only weaknesses are mild — a slightly indulgent example list and a workflow whose steps are scattered across two sections rather than presented as one ordered flow.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — no padding explaining what markdown or writing is — and the fragment taxonomy and file-format example are non-obvious, load-bearing content. Minor over-explanation remains: the 9-bullet fragment example list and the 'novelist's diary' aside could each be trimmed without losing guidance. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | For an instruction-only skill, the guidance is fully executable: concrete interview behavior ('grilling session... interviewing the user relentlessly'), a precise first-write format ('a single H1... no metadata, no TOC, no date'), an explicit save-path protocol, a copy-paste-ready file format with the exact separator ('\n---\n'), and first-class handling of concrete edit commands ('cut the last one', 'merge those two'). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear and unambiguous (grill for fragments → ask for the save path once → first write with H1 only → append silently thereafter), and it includes a genuine checkpoint: 'Before every write: re-read the file from disk... preserve their changes. Never overwrite; only append.' It falls short of 5 because the steps are distributed across the what-to-do and writing-rhythm sections rather than presented as one coherent ordered flow, leaving minor sequencing gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | This is a single-file skill with no bundle files (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), and none are needed: the body is short, all content is load-bearing on every turn, and it is cleanly organized (what-to-do vs supporting-info, with headed sections 'What is a fragment', 'File format', 'Writing rhythm'). Per the simple-skill scoring note, well-organized sections with no nested references score full marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |