Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise, well-structured, and mostly actionable with concrete paths and code snippets. Its main weakness is reference-style content lacking a true multi-step workflow with validation checkpoints.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean (~36 lines of lists, code, and short notes) with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line adds specific, non-obvious detail like load order and cache path, matching the score-5 lean-and-efficient anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete paths, an executable opencode.json snippet, and a TS plugin template with minor gaps: the template's hook bodies are a comment stub and no real hook example is shown, fitting the score-4 anchor of mostly executable guidance with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a reference-style skill rather than a multi-step workflow; load order is stated explicitly but there is no sequenced process or validation checkpoints, matching the score-3 anchor of sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is cleanly split into well-labeled sections (Quick Usage, Minimal plugin template, Notes, Reference) with the one external reference clearly signaled as an escape hatch; for a sub-50-line skill needing no bundle files, this meets the score-5 well-organized bar. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |