Content
73%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is exceptionally actionable with a well-sequenced, validated workflow and clearly signaled one-level references. Its main weakness is verbosity: the same critical warnings and error-prevention guidance are repeated across three separate sections, inflating the token budget without adding capability.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated trend-reading warnings: keep the detailed checks in Step 4.1.5 and reduce 'Common Analysis Errors' and the Step 8 QA checklist to concise cross-references rather than restating the full guidance.
Move the Chart 1/Chart 2 element descriptions and backtested strategy rules (which duplicate references/breadth_chart_methodology.md) into the reference file, keeping SKILL.md as a concise overview that points to it.
Trim the redundant 'Language Note' / 'IMPORTANT: All analysis and output must be in English' reminders — stated once in the overview is sufficient given the dedicated Special Notes section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 660-line body is noticeably padded: the same guidance (8MA vs 200MA color confusion, rightmost-data-point focus, death/golden cross, pink background, 2-3 period confirmation) is repeated three to four times across Step 4.1.5, 'Common Analysis Errors', and the Step 8 QA checklist, creating several redundant sections without adding new information. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an analysis skill: concrete thresholds (73%, 23%, 10%, 40%), explicit confirmation rules (2-3 consecutive periods), defined signal statuses (CONFIRMED/DEVELOPING/FAILED/NO SIGNAL), file-naming conventions, and three fully worked examples with specific percentages cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1-8 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — 'MANDATORY CROSS-CHECK', 'FINAL SANITY CHECK', the 14-item QA checklist, and a failed-reversal feedback loop that sends the analyst back to re-examine trend direction. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Bundle references are clearly signaled one level deep ('Read:', 'View:', 'Read and use as template:') with a Resources section describing each file, but the body inlines substantial chart-element and strategy detail that duplicates the bundled methodology reference rather than deferring to it. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |