Conciseness

Several padded sections: "RSI = 100 - (100 / (1 + RS))" explains a formula Claude knows, the "Dividend Growth Compounding Examples" yield-on-cost tables and "Interpreting RSI Levels" entry/stop-loss advice duplicate the bundled references, and RSI zones are defined twice (Phase 2 and Understanding the Results). Below anchor 3 because the padding is more than "some" — roughly 40% could move to the existing reference files; above anchor 1 because the operational core (commands, flags, rate limits, troubleshooting) is efficient.

Actionability

Copy-paste-ready commands with concrete flags ("--use-finviz", "--max-candidates 40", "--min-yield 2.0 --min-div-growth 15.0 --rsi-max 35") cover the common cases, plus env-var setup and rate-limit math. Below anchor 5 because of the hedged output-location guidance ("the CLI may not accept --output-dir... Some builds write to the repository logs/ directory... verify the printed paths") and the script path "skills/dividend-growth-pullback-screener/scripts/" not matching the actual bundle layout (scripts/).

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1-4 are clearly sequenced with a recommended vs. fallback path, and the Troubleshooting section (no results, rate limit, RSI errors) provides cause-to-solution error recovery. Below anchor 5 because there is no explicit checkpoint to confirm the output files were written before analyzing them — output verification is hedged rather than prescribed.

Progressive Disclosure

All bundled files referenced in the body are real (references/dividend_growth_compounding.md, references/rsi_oversold_strategy.md, references/fmp_api_guide.md, scripts/screen_dividend_growth_rsi.py, scripts/fmp_client.py) and are documented with content bullets in the Resources section — but ~50 lines of body content (compounding tables, RSI zone interpretation) duplicate those reference files instead of pointing to them, and references are not linked at point of use. Below anchor 4 because the inline duplication is not a minor gap; above anchor 2 because structure and reference signaling are otherwise good.

Specificity

"find high-quality dividend growth stocks (12%+ annual dividend growth, 1.5%+ yield)" and "combines fundamental dividend analysis with technical timing indicators" name concrete, quantified actions with exact thresholds. Above anchor 3 because the actions are specific and parameterized; below anchor 5 because coverage is narrow — only screening/finding is described, with no mention of ranking, reports, or analysis outputs.

Completeness

The 'what' is clear (screen for dividend growth stocks with 12%+ CAGR, 1.5%+ yield, RSI ≤40) and a 'when' is present via the explicit trigger guidance "Use this skill to find... during short-term weakness". Not 5 because there is no separate "Use when..." clause with concrete trigger phrases (e.g., 'when the user mentions RSI, dividend growth, or pullback entries'); not 3 because the when-condition is explicitly stated, not merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like "dividend growth stocks", "RSI oversold conditions", "temporary pullbacks", "buying opportunities", and "short-term weakness" give good keyword coverage with some synonyms. Below anchor 5 because common variations users would say — "screen"/"screener", "undervalued", "dip" — are missing; above anchor 3 because coverage exceeds a couple of generic keywords.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The quantified dual criteria (12%+ dividend growth, 1.5%+ yield, RSI ≤40) carve a clear niche distinct from yield/value screeners. Below anchor 5 because generic phrasing like "identify buying opportunities" could overlap with closely related dividend- or RSI-screening skills on broad requests.