Conciseness

Several sections re-teach material Claude already knows and that is duplicated in the bundle's own reference files: the RSI formula and 14-period calculation (lines 172–183), the full "Interpreting RSI Levels" ladder (lines 197–215), and the "Dividend Growth Compounding Examples" with yield-on-cost tables (lines 217–237) all restate `references/rsi_oversold_strategy.md` and `references/dividend_growth_compounding.md`. This matches the anchor for noticeably verbose content with several unnecessary explanations or padded sections; it is not 3 because the duplication is systematic rather than an occasional over-explanation.

Actionability

Every workflow step gives copy-paste-ready commands — `python3 skills/dividend-growth-pullback-screener/scripts/screen_dividend_growth_rsi.py --use-finviz` plus FMP-only, customization, and API-key-argument variants — and the flags (--min-yield, --min-div-growth, --rsi-max, --max-candidates) match the script's actual argparse, with named output files and concrete troubleshooting commands. This matches the fully-executable anchor covering the common cases.

Workflow Clarity

A clear four-step sequence (set keys → execute screening → review results → analyze stocks) with feedback loops in Troubleshooting for the main failure modes (no results, rate limits with the two-stage fix, insufficient price data handled automatically). Not 5 because there is no explicit verification step that the expected output files were generated and are parseable — the Output section instead hedges that "the CLI may not accept --output-dir" and "verify the printed paths" — leaving a minor validation gap.

Progressive Disclosure

The bundle is well organized — three real reference files listed with descriptions in a Resources section, one level deep, plus the script — but substantial content that belongs in those files is inlined in SKILL.md (the RSI interpretation ladder and compounding-math examples duplicate `rsi_oversold_strategy.md` and `dividend_growth_compounding.md`). This fits the anchor where structure exists but content that should be separate is inline; not 4 because the duplication spans two full sections rather than being a minor organization gap.

Specificity

Quantifies the core capabilities concretely — "12%+ annual dividend growth, 1.5%+ yield", "RSI ≤40", "combines fundamental dividend analysis with technical timing indicators" — matching the anchor for several specific actions with minor gaps. It falls short of 5 because coverage is incomplete: screening/finding is the only stated action and the JSON/markdown report outputs are never mentioned; it is well above 3 because the actions given are precise and parameterized rather than generic.

Completeness

The "what" is explicit and specific (find dividend growth stocks meeting 12%+ CAGR, 1.5%+ yield, RSI ≤40), but no "Use when..." clause or equivalent trigger guidance exists; "during short-term weakness" describes market conditions rather than when the user should reach for the skill, and the rubric caps completeness at 3 in this case. Not 2 because the "what" half is fully present; not 4 because the "when" is absent rather than merely implicit-but-recoverable.

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage — "dividend growth stocks", "temporary pullbacks", "RSI oversold", "buying opportunities", "strong dividend growers" — phrases a user would plausibly say. Not 5 because common variations are missing (e.g. "screen/screener", "stock screen", "buy the dip", "undervalued"); clearly above 3 since multiple relevant natural terms are present rather than just a few.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The combination of "12%+ annual dividend growth, 1.5%+ yield" with "RSI ≤40" pullback timing carves a mostly distinct niche with concrete triggers. Not 5 because the skill family it belongs to contains closely related screeners (the body itself points users to a sibling "value-dividend-screener" for high-yield cases), leaving minor overlap risk on generic "dividend stock" requests; well above 3 since the criteria are specific enough to disambiguate.