Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured and actionable with copy-paste commands and clear references to real bundle files. The main weaknesses are minor: a redundant feature list at the top, an abstract Step 2, and a missing validate-JSON-before-merge checkpoint.
Suggestions
Remove or trim the opening 'The script supports' bullet list, since each item is restated in the Workflow steps below.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 3: verify the LLM review JSON conforms to references/llm_review_schema.md before running the merge command.
Make Step 2 more concrete by showing the expected prompt-file path pattern and the JSON shape the LLM must return, rather than only describing the orchestration abstractly.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient with headers, bullets, and copy-paste code blocks and does not over-explain concepts Claude already knows, but the opening 'The script supports' feature list partly recapitulates the later workflow steps — minor trimmable redundancy that keeps it just below the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable commands (uv run invocations with full flags, REVIEWER placeholder setup) that are copy-paste ready, but Step 2 ('Run LLM Review') is somewhat abstract orchestration guidance rather than a concrete runnable command, leaving a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence (auto-axis + prompt, LLM review, merge, optional controls) is present, but there is no explicit validation checkpoint (e.g., verify the LLM JSON conforms to the schema before merging); the operation is non-destructive so the score-3 cap does not apply, leaving a minor checkpoint gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview that signals one-level-deep references to real bundle files — 'references/llm_review_schema.md' and 'references/scoring_rubric.md' (both present) — plus the script and tests directory, with content appropriately split rather than inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |