Review skills in any project using a dual-axis method: (1) deterministic code-based checks (structure, scripts, tests, execution safety) and (2) LLM deep review findings. Use when you need reproducible quality scoring for `skills/*/SKILL.md`, want to gate merges with a score threshold (for example 90+), or need concrete improvement items for low-scoring skills. Works across projects via --project-root.
63
73%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Fix and improve this skill with Tessl
tessl review fix ./skills/dual-axis-skill-reviewer/SKILL.mdLow
Low-risk findings.
1 low severity finding. Worth noting, but not necessarily harmful.
The skill exposes the agent to untrusted, user-generated content from public third-party sources, creating a risk of indirect prompt injection. This includes browsing arbitrary URLs, reading social media posts or forum comments, and analyzing content from unknown websites.
The required workflow generates an LLM prompt by reading the selected skill’s outsider-authored files at runtime (the repo’s `skills/*/SKILL.md`, plus inventory of `scripts/*.py`, `tests/test_*.py`, and `references/*.md` from the target project) and writes that prompt for the LLM to consume (Step 1 + `--emit-llm-prompt` → `build_llm_prompt()`), so injected free text from an untrusted skill repository can enter LLM context.
62a1635
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.