Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validated workflow and properly signaled references, but it runs long and repeats the legacy-endpoint deprecation multiple times, which hurts token efficiency. Splitting the report-format and impact-assessment material into reference files would improve progressive disclosure and conciseness.
Suggestions
Consolidate the legacy-endpoint retirement note into a single 'Deprecated endpoints' section instead of restating the 2025-08-31 retirement ~4 times across the body.
Move the full Markdown report-format templates and impact-assessment taxonomy into a separate reference file, keeping only a concise inline example.
Trim conceptual explanations Claude already knows (e.g., what high/medium/low impact means in general market terms) and retain only FMP-specific field and behavior notes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 375-line body is mostly efficient but includes redundant repetition of the legacy-endpoint retirement (stated ~4 times) and some conceptual explanation Claude already knows (impact-level definitions, market-sensitivity framing) that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready, fully executable script invocations with exact paths and flags, a full parameter list, the JSON event structure, and complete Markdown report templates with a worked example — covering the common fetch and report-generation cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–6 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints (date-range validation in Step 2, a detailed error-handling table, and an empty-list/404 re-verify feedback loop), so the read-only fetch flow has clear error-recovery guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with a clearly signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/fmp_api_documentation.md, which exists) and the script under scripts/, but substantial inline detail (full report templates, impact-assessment taxonomy) could be split into separate files. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |