Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validated workflow and concrete executable commands, but it is verbose — repeating the deprecation note and inlining impact/reporting guidance Claude largely already knows or could derive.
Suggestions
Collapse the repeated 'legacy v3 endpoint retired 2025-08-31 / returns 403' note into one canonical statement; it currently appears three times (Overview, Step 3, Resources).
Trim the Step 5 impact-level tutorial to a short pointer to the FMP 'impact' field plus a note that the assistant assesses context, removing general financial knowledge Claude already has.
Move the lengthy report-template spec into references/fmp_api_documentation.md (or a reports reference) and leave a concise skeleton inline, improving both conciseness and progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The core (script invocations, params, response schema) is efficient and actionable, but the body is padded with a ~40-line impact-level tutorial, long report templates Claude could generate, and the legacy-endpoint-retired note repeated verbatim three times. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands, a complete script parameter list, the full JSON response structure, concrete filter examples, and copy-paste-ready Markdown report templates. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (date-range rules in Step 2) and per-HTTP-status error-recovery feedback loops in Step 3. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single reference file (fmp_api_documentation.md) and script are real, one level deep, and clearly signaled, but the body inlines large blocks (report-format spec, impact-assessment tutorial) that could be offloaded, leaving organization good but not optimally split. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |