CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

edge-strategy-reviewer

Critically review strategy drafts from edge-strategy-designer for edge plausibility, overfitting risk, sample size adequacy, and execution realism. Use when strategy_drafts/*.yaml exists and needs quality gate before pipeline export. Outputs PASS/REVISE/REJECT verdicts with confidence scores.

80

Quality

100%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Edge Strategy Reviewer

Deterministic quality gate for strategy drafts produced by edge-strategy-designer.

When to Use

  • After edge-strategy-designer generates strategy_drafts/*.yaml
  • Before exporting drafts to edge-candidate-agent via the pipeline
  • When manually validating a draft strategy for edge plausibility

Prerequisites

  • Strategy draft YAML files (output of edge-strategy-designer)
  • Python 3.10+ with PyYAML

Workflow

  1. Load draft YAML files from --drafts-dir or a single --draft file
  2. Evaluate each draft against 8 criteria (C1-C8) with weighted scoring
  3. Compute confidence score (weighted average of all criteria)
  4. Determine verdict: PASS / REVISE / REJECT
  5. Assess export eligibility (PASS + export_ready_v1 + exportable family)
  6. Write review output (YAML or JSON) and optional markdown summary

Review Criteria

#CriterionWeightKey Checks
C1Edge Plausibility20Thesis quality, domain terms, mechanism keywords (continuous 50-95)
C2Overfitting Risk205-tier filter count scoring (90/80/60/40/10), precise threshold penalty
C3Sample Adequacy15Continuous scoring from estimated annual opportunities (10-95)
C4Regime Dependency10Cross-regime validation
C5Exit Calibration10Stop-loss, reward-to-risk
C6Risk Concentration10Position sizing limits
C7Execution Realism10Volume filter, export consistency
C8Invalidation Quality5Signal count and specificity

Verdict Logic

  • C1 or C2 severity=fail → immediate REJECT
  • confidence >= 70, no fail findings → PASS
  • confidence < 35 → REJECT
  • Otherwise → REVISE (with revision instructions)

Running the Script

# Review all drafts in a directory
python3 skills/edge-strategy-reviewer/scripts/review_strategy_drafts.py \
  --drafts-dir reports/edge_strategy_drafts/ \
  --output-dir reports/

# Single draft review
python3 skills/edge-strategy-reviewer/scripts/review_strategy_drafts.py \
  --draft reports/edge_strategy_drafts/draft_xxx.yaml \
  --output-dir reports/

# JSON output with markdown summary
python3 skills/edge-strategy-reviewer/scripts/review_strategy_drafts.py \
  --drafts-dir reports/edge_strategy_drafts/ \
  --output-dir reports/ \
  --format json \
  --markdown-summary

# Strict export mode: export-eligible drafts with any warn → REVISE
python3 skills/edge-strategy-reviewer/scripts/review_strategy_drafts.py \
  --drafts-dir reports/edge_strategy_drafts/ \
  --output-dir reports/ \
  --strict-export

Output Format

Primary output: review.yaml (or review.json)

generated_at_utc: "2026-02-28T12:00:00+00:00"
source:
  drafts_dir: "/path/to/strategy_drafts"
  draft_count: 4
summary:
  total: 4
  PASS: 1
  REVISE: 2
  REJECT: 1
  export_eligible: 1
reviews:
  - draft_id: "draft_xxx_core"
    verdict: "PASS"
    confidence_score: 80
    export_eligible: true
    findings: [...]
    revision_instructions: []

Resources

  • references/review_criteria.md — Detailed scoring rubric for C1-C8
  • references/overfitting_checklist.md — Overfitting detection heuristics
Repository
tradermonty/claude-trading-skills
Last updated
First committed

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.