Conciseness

The body is dense and assumes domain competence (no padding explaining what dividends or payout ratios are), but unresolvable internal-history tokens ("defect D5", "D4", "D3", "the CFR D5 fix") and Guardrails that largely restate body rules spend tokens a fresh reader cannot benefit from — anchor 4 (efficient with minor trimmable instances), not 5.

Actionability

Two complete executable commands with flags and a deterministic example (build_sop_plan.py / build_entry_signals.py invocations), concrete JSON input shapes, and hard numeric thresholds (yield floors 4.0/3.0/1.5%, +0.5pp trigger, 40%->30%->30% splits, >25% GAAP/Adjusted divergence) make most guidance copy-paste ready; minor gaps — the Step 4b WebSearch/IR check has no concrete example command, and `scripts/run_all_tests.sh` is referenced but absent from the bundle — keep it at 4 rather than 5.

Workflow Clarity

Steps 1–8 are explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints throughout: the Data Freshness Gate emitting STEP1-RECHECK instead of a hard FAIL, the fail-safe "adjusted_eps_source = UNAVAILABLE ⇒ HOLD-REVIEW (never a silent PASS)", the pessimistic T1 cap on failed/skipped event scans, pre-order blocker gating of the first tranche, and the "thesis intact vs structural break" sanity check — this is the anchor 5 pattern of explicit validation and feedback loops, above anchor 4's 'most checkpoints'.

Progressive Disclosure

The body is a genuine overview with four one-level-deep references/ files (default-thresholds, sector-step2-modules, valuation-and-one-off-checks, stock-note-template — all verified present) each signalled at point of use, and scripts documented in a Resources section; it falls short of 5 because `scripts/run_all_tests.sh` is referenced but does not exist in the bundle and cross-skill paths point outside it.

Specificity

"Covers screening, deep dive, entry planning, and post-purchase monitoring cadence" plus concrete actions like "PERxPBR adaptation for US sectors, pullback limit-order planning, or one-page stock memo creation" gives comprehensive, specific coverage of the whole workflow with no obvious gaps — matches the anchor 5 example's breadth, clearly above anchor 4's 'minor gaps'.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both: what ("Convert Kanchi-style dividend investing into a repeatable US-stock operating procedure… Covers screening, deep dive, entry planning, and post-purchase monitoring cadence") and when ("Use when users ask for かんち式配当投資, dividend screening, …") with concrete trigger phrases — a direct match to the anchor 5 example; anchor 4 would require the 'when' to be less explicit.

Trigger Term Quality

Good natural keyword coverage including the source-language trigger "かんち式配当投資" alongside "dividend screening" and "one-page stock memo creation", but "PERxPBR" is jargon and common user phrasings like "dividend income" or "yield screening" are missing — fits anchor 4 (good coverage, a few natural terms missing) rather than anchor 5's synonym-and-extension completeness.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"Kanchi-style" and "かんち式配当投資" carve a clear niche with minimal conflict risk, but the generic term "dividend screening" overlaps sibling dividend screener skills, so it sits at anchor 4 ('mostly distinct; minor overlap risk with closely related skills') rather than anchor 5.