Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable SOP body with strong workflow validation and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure across verified bundle files. Its main weakness is conciseness: the same rules are restated across Prerequisites, Steps, and Guardrails, and internal review-artifact codes add tokens without execution value.
Suggestions
Deduplicate guidance repeated across sections: keep the input-source priority, --yield-floor warning, regular-forward-yield rule, and failed/skipped-event-scan rule in one canonical place and have Guardrails reference rather than restate them.
Remove or relocate internal review-artifact references (defect codes D3/D4/D5, 'CFR D5 fix', 'FITB/Comerica golden case', 'MKC-Unilever miss') that do not help Claude execute the workflow, or move them into a references/CHANGELOG.md.
Trim the two JSON input examples and the surrounding handoff-shape paragraph to the single most common shape, pointing to a reference for the variants.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and free of basic-concept over-explanation, but weakened by redundancy (input source priority appears in both 'Input Sources' and Step 2; the --yield-floor warning, the regular-yield rule, and the failed/skipped-event-scan rule are each restated in Guardrails) and internal artifact codes (D3/D4/D5, 'CFR D5 fix', 'FITB/Comerica golden case', 'MKC-Unilever miss') that pad tokens without aiding execution. Not 3 because the redundancy and review-artifact references could be tightened; not 1 because it does not explain concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands with real flags, paths, and tickers (e.g. build_entry_signals.py --tickers "JNJ,PG,KO" --alpha-pp 0.5 --yield-floor 3.0 --profile balanced --events-json ...) plus concrete JSON input formats, exact verdict tiers, and precise thresholds (40/30/30 sizing, ±0.20pp freshness, 4.0/3.0/1.5% floors). Matches the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly numbered 1-8 sequence (with 6b) carrying explicit fail-safe validation at nearly every gate — Data Freshness Gate => STEP1-RECHECK, adjusted_eps_source=UNAVAILABLE => HOLD-REVIEW, pessimistic cap => HOLD-REVIEW + T1 BLOCKED, pre-order blocker downsizing — plus a test merge-gate (test_golden_p0.py) and a re-run cadence as feedback. Not 2 because the checkpoints are explicit and pervasive, not implicit. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References are real, one-level-deep, and signaled inline at each step (Load references/default-thresholds.md; Use references/sector-step2-modules.md) with a consolidated Resources section giving per-file descriptions; deep detail (thresholds, sector modules, valuation rules, memo template) is appropriately pushed into references/scripts rather than nested. Not 2 because the references are clearly signaled and the split is appropriate, though some inline defect-code detail borders on content that could be separated. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |